I didn't read the book. I listened to it. Having not read it critically, I think I probably enjoyed it more. Wilson described the central issue of the book as a case for "the replacement of inclusive fitness theory (kin selection theory) by multilevel selection theory (i.e., individual and group selection combined), with a new and major role assigned to group selection in the origin of advanced social behavior." (NYT). What I heard was more like: Altruism is a critical element in the evolution of human civilization and ecological dominance. Maybe it's the same thing. More "all for one and one for all" than "survival of the fittest". The irony is that Wilson is hypercritical of religion, but his theory enhances the importance of following the "Golden Rule" and acting for the benefit others. I also learned this tidbit of information: The identification of colors with language evolves in a similar pattern across cultures. Societies with one and two colors will have words for black and/or white; the third color will be red; and the fourth color will be yellow or green. Could explain the use of certain colors in medicine wheels. This book explores the biological origins of the human social condition. Throughout the book, Wilson reinforces the idea of group selection and individual selection as being the reason for our current social condition on Earth. Group selection ensures reciprocity within a group and maximises competition between groups and hence 'good' remains in individuals belonging to their group. Individual selection favours competition amongst members of the same group for resources, mate selection and ultimately survival.. and hence 'evil' balances out the 'good' in a group.Most of the topics covered in the book are not new to me, however, the concept of eusociality is. Wilson explains our social behaviour by comparing it to the highly structured societies of ants (cooperative individuals who divide labour and defend a common nesting site). I had learnt about the multigenerational societies of ants years ago in high school but never made any link between theirs and ours social organisation. This book does a fantastic job in sewing the link between eusociality in insects and homo sapiens.My favourite part of the book was the last chapter named "A New Enlightment" - It was informative; not in the traditional sense but by exploring the reader's mind. I would read the whole book again just to gain satisfaction reading the last chapter.
What do You think about A Conquista Da Terra (2012)?
Important insight into the role of group selection in human evolution.
—hrsch1234
As usual, E.O. Wilson is batting higher than the rest of us.
—starsiona
