Henry Lee, who had testified for the defense in the O.J. Simpson murder case. It was in part due to Dr. Lee’s testimony that the Los Angeles jury had found O.J. Simpson innocent of any crime. During that trial, Dr. Lee stated that he found three “imprints” on the terracotta walkway on Bundy, the famous crime scene that Lee himself photographed. Lee further testified that these imprints did not match the size-twelve bloody shoe prints, made by Bruno Magli shoes, that prosecutors said belonged to O.J. Simpson. In Dr. Lee’s O.J. Simpson testimony, his findings revealed a “parallel-line imprint,” as well as another “imprint,” which did not match O.J. Simpson’s shoes. This inferred the possibility of a second assailant being at the crime scene. Dr. Lee’s testimony, therefore, challenged the prosecution’s theory that O.J. Simpson was a lone assailant. In essence, Dr. Henry Lee managed to challenge the core of the prosecution’s case against the former NFL star. In response, one of the FBI’s senior experts on shoe prints, William Bodziak, testified that Dr.
