What do You think about Body Surfing (2007)?
Warning! Stay out of the water. It's not safe to go Body Surfing!I've read several Anita Shreve books (Fortune's Rocks, Pilot's Wife, The Last Time They Met) none of which I call stellar but all much better than this one.Sydner Sklar finds herself once widowed and once divorced in her late twenties. She drops out of grad school and takes a summer job as a live in tutor for the Edwards family who live on the idyllic New Hampshire shore. (And who live in the same house that pops up in many Shreve books.) While tutoring 18-year old Julie, Sydney aimlessly drifts into the vortex of this dysfunctional family. Right out of Harlequin, she is attracted to both of the older brothers Ben and Jeff, she is shunned by their cold, resentful mother, and she adores the noble father.Warning. I am about to spoil the plot, if you can actually call it a plot.Over one fateful night, our heroine ends up in a romance with Jeff which drives a wedge between the brothers. Despite a less than compelling relationship, Sydney and Jeff move in together and get engaged. Eleven months later, Jeff dumps her at the altar when he admits to himself and to her that the reason he is with her is because he didn't want his brother Ben to have her. As it turns out, this isn't the first time Jeff has pulled such a stunt in competition with his brother. Jeff heads off to Africa. Sydney loafs around Boston to recover from the shock. She ends up back at the beach several years later and runs into Ben and they end up body surfing naked at night. How stupid.Why am I bothering to write so much about a book I disliked so? Good question. I'll eek a few more words on my 3 biggest gripes.1. The writing style. The first 18 pages is mostly incomplete sentences. I cannot figure out why this writer chose that style. It was hard to immerse myself in the story when it felt like I was skimming along the tops of choppy waves in a high powered speed boat. Not a fun ride.2. Sydney was milk toast. She was a completely bland character that I didn't understand, like, relate to, or even want to spend time with.3. Outlandish plot lines - There are great works of fiction with completely implausible plot lines. This is not one of them. She ends up naked on the beach with the brother of the man who left her at the altar. Whatever!Rating - 1 out of 5 stars. Why did I read past the first chapter?
—Margaret
I wasn't expecting much from this book, and was pleasantly surprised during the first third. Anita Shreve writes with skill, although I could have done without quite as much description of what people are wearing - especially since they change their clothes at least twice a day. But she captures the scene of a WASPy New England family summering on the coast of New Hampshire perfectly.[return]But by the last third, I started wondering whether she knew quite where she was trying to go with the development of Sydney and the course of her life, and the end felt a bit loose.[return]I often find it difficult to enjoy books that are so focused on the emotions of their characters, because they seem somewhat false to me, but that is one problem I did not encounter here. Shreve nails the emotions in every situation, for every character, and it all feels just right. I didn't love the plot and felt the end was weak, but all the same this was an enjoyable read, and not as light as I had expected.
—Nicole
This is the first book I have read by Anita Shreve and I have to say I am very disappointed in this author. Some of the users of shelfari rated Shreve right up there with Jodi Picoult and that is why I borrowed this novel from a friend in the first place. Shreve doesn't compare at ALL to the likes of Picoult!! First of all ,the writing style in this novel is extremely choppy and distracting. Second, the characters are never fully explained and or developed. I never really felt any emotion from this author. I found it odd that she could be really descriptive about something but never fully explain what was going on. I felt like she was writing an essay and needed to meet a quota of "words used" instead of writing a well thought-out novel. In other words she had this annoying way of describing things using to many words but never really saying what needed to be said. It was tortuous to continue to read this novel but I didn't want to be a quitter so I continued. Don't bother with this book it was a complete waste of time! Not enjoyable at all! I really don't want to give up on this author but I just don't know if I can try again with one of her books!
—Jennefer