Share for friends:

Read Boredom (2004)

Boredom (2004)

Online Book

Rating
3.83 of 5 Votes: 2
Your rating
ISBN
1590171217 (ISBN13: 9781590171219)
Language
English
Publisher
nyrb classics

Boredom (2004) - Plot & Excerpts

أحيانا ً تصبح الحياة هي الوهم الأخير الذي يجب علينا أن نتخلى عنه من أجل الحياة ! كيف !!!!لا أعرف ، الإجابة على سؤال ملتبس يحتاج عمرا ً كاملا ً ، و التفكير في حياة ملتبسة يحتاج الحديث عما عايشه الإنسان في حياته أكثر من مرة ، ربما كان هنا حدث ٌ بسيط ، حدث ٌ تافه ، قادر على التغيير في صياغة أحداثنا اليومية ، و ترتيب مشاعرنا من جديد ، حالة السأم التي يمر بها الإنسان ، طبيعية جدا ً ، لأن هذه الحياة تسببها لأنها بغيضة و مملة بتفاصيلها الصغيرة و الكبيرة ، الحياة ليست سوى تفاصيل ، هذه التفاصيل هي ما يحكم يومياتنا ، و يحيلنا أحيانا ً إلى بشر ٍأو إلى لا بشر !حالة اللابشرية التي يسببها لنا السأم ، حالة مستدامة لن نستطيع التخلّي عنها أبدا ً ، لأننا لا نقدر على ذلك ، السأم مصير ، و السأم ملجأ من تفاصيل الدهشة الحياتية !/دينو أو الماركيز أو الرسام أو المصاب بالسأم ، سيسيليا كانت نسخة مشابهة لدينو ، كانت النسخة الأنثوية له !كل ما عدا ذلك تفاصيل ليومياتنا نحن ، لطريقة تعاملنا مع السأم ، لمحاولة تفسيرات الحب ، و الحياة و السأم و الموت و المال و طرق الانتحار ، دوما ً ما كنت أفكر في الانتحار ، ليس لأنه وسيلة احتجاج لأنه وسيلة تخلّص من تكرار الحياة ، الحياة المتكررة مملة جدا ، هذه الحياة التي عاشها دينو في مرسمه في بيوت الدعارة ، مع سيسيليا مع أمه ، مع باليستياري ، مع الكل ،ربما مع هذا الكون ، التخطيط للزواج التخطيط للتملّك أحيانا ً من أجل التخلّص ، الامتلاك أحيانا ً يكون وسيلة تخلّي ، وسيلة خلاص هكذا كان يفكّر دينو ، أنا أفكر مثله بطريقة ٍ مختلفة ٍ نوعا ً ، بطريقة ٍ ملتبسة جدا ، بطريقة الجمع و الطرح ، هذا زائد عن الحاجة ، هذا أحتاجه للأيام القادمة ، هذا يجب أن أتخلص منه ، هذا يجب أن أمتلكه ، امتلاكنا للأشياء من أجل التخلّص من الأشياء ، باختصار ، الحياةعبارة عن تعابير مواربة لما نقوم به من أشياء ، الحياة عبارة عن خيط من اليوميات المسببة للسأم !سأم سأم سأم إلخ إلخ إلخ !و ثم ماذا ، لا شيء سوى السأم /دينو ، كنت أحمقا ً جدا ، سيسيليا ، كنت ِ حمقاءأكثر ، لكن هناك شيء ٌدائم ٌ في هذه الحياة ، أن المرأة أقدر على فهم الحياة من الرجل ؛ المرأة متعتها هذه الحياة ، بينما الرجل معضلته الحياة !دايس

When I think of boredom I think of a flat blankness and sensory living-deadness; a kind of soul emptiness so empty that there’s not even enough passion to be tormented by it. But this isn’t Moravia’s boredom. His boredom is what I often refer to (during my own episodes of it) as alienation: a pervasive alienation from all things and all people that stifles the still straining passions thus causing quite a soul’s load of torment. If his boredom had been what I typically think of as boredom then this novel would’ve probably been intolerable, especially at 320 pages, but… well, it was far from boring, it was fascinating.It’s the story of a rich, highly analytical man, an artist who has abandoned painting, who, while suffering through a protracted case of “boredom”, gets involved with a teenage woman with big tits and womanly hips who has not a single analytical nerve in her lovely headpiece. She is in fact a psychic blank with grinding hips, and she is far too much for our analytical protagonist to handle.There is one very telling passage somewhere near the middle of the book where Dino, our protagonist, observes that Cecilia, our hips, suffers from the same boredom as he, but doesn’t know it as she’s never known anything but that boredom, and so she is not tormented as he is tormented. This is just one of many sticking points that prevent Dino from fully possessing/understanding Ceclia, and the novel is propelled by his attempts to possess/understand her so that he can discard her and disentangle himself and get on with his life of boredom.It’s an excruciating tale, relentless in its coldly analytical momentum, but it’s also humorous in its own way. It’s humorous in the way that only the humorless can be. That is to say, there is no attempt at humor, but there’s something inherently humorous about obsessive analysis confronting that which eludes analysis, such as sex or a purely instinctual woman who only lives moment to moment. There is also something inherently humorous about the after-the-fact analysis of such encounters, as of an alien entity describing life on a distant planet where every little rule of conduct is different from a previously known norm; a transformation of the mundane into the inalterably odd. I’m not saying that I laughed out loud while reading Boredom, but there was enough of this humor to maintain the narrative at a jaunty pace.And what a pace it was! I could not put this book down. There’s a cool crispness and clarity to the narrative voice, with every sentence inevitably linked to the next, so that even the excessive detail that is invariably the product of over-analysis was just so much more to enjoy. But I did have one gripe with the translation, though this nit might’ve been in the original; and that was a weird dialogue tic expressed through the contraction “d’you”, as in “do you”. Why this was insisted on I couldn’t figure out, as the rest of the book is written in a clean and orderly way. Even the dialogue is clean and orderly besides this little tic. I found myself trying to pronounce “d’you” and it just sounded stupid, as I couldn’t entirely cut out that initial “o”. Try it and you’ll see.

What do You think about Boredom (2004)?

Penso di amare Moravia, è decisamente entrato a far parte dei miei autori preferiti. Non voglio (e non sarebbe facile) fare una recensione dettagliata di questo libro.. bisogna leggerlo, impossibile descriverlo e riassumerlo in una recensione. Ci tengo solo a dire che 1) non avrei mai immaginato di sentir parlare di "noia" intesa come la intende Moravia e l'argomento in sé mi ha presa tantissimo.2) lo stile di scrittura di Moravia mi ha dato numerosi orgasmi letterari: potrebbe scrivere la qualsiasi e io ne resterei comunque ammaliata.In conclusione, direi che è stata una lettura davvero soddisfacente e abbastanza veloce (considerando che sono partita, ho finito il romanzo prima del previsto). Consigliatissimo! Fatevi un favore, e leggete questo romanzo.
—Federica

This book should have been titled “Possession” for it deals with obsessive-possessive love spawned by the boredom of the disengaged.Dino is a 35 year-old painter who has lost his touch, a spoiled only-child of a doting but rich mother. He hates the lifestyle she represents yet willingly settles for a generous “allowance” so that he can live apart and “poor.” This pseudo-poor state does not do his soul any good (for he can always go back to mama for a stake if times get tough) and he drifts into an obsessive relationship with a seventeen year old working class girl, Cecilia, who was the model for an older painter and neighbour, Balastrieri. The old painter has just died, reputedly in the throes of wild and compulsive sex with his model. Dino rationalizes that if he can quickly love and dump Cecilia, without any emotional entanglement, he should emerge the superior. The reality is that our weak hero quickly takes Balastrieri’s place by falling for the young woman’s deadly mix of indifferent affections, apparent naivety and primal carnality. What follows is a chase in which Dino attempts to possess Cecilia so that he can discard her, while she leads him on a dance of jealousy as she openly shares his affections with a younger actor.Despite a thin story line, psychological tensions run high in this novel as each character is trying to gain possession of another: Dino’s mother of her son through money; Dino of Cecilia via sex, money, marriage, even contemplated murder; Balastrieri of Cecilia via his health-destroying romps in the sack and obsessive painting of her half-woman, half-child body—none of which work and only lead to more emptiness and desire. And it takes a knock on the head for Dino to come to his senses and realize that people can be loved even if they stand separate from each other, and that this is the most endearing and satisfying form of love. Cecilia represents the childlike beacon, steering those who come across her path towards this epiphany. I found the writing dense with long narrative passages relieved only in places by staccato dialogue. Dino (like the author, I suspect), the first-person narrator, is obsessive about detail and gives us too much information most of the time, particularly around his thoughts and motivations. To his credit, the author gives us the painter’s appreciation for form in his descriptive passages; Dino analyses Cecilia’s physical frame into a myriad of dimensions and characteristics: “the thinness of the torso, the vigorous curve of the lower back, the superabundant masculinity of the loins” etc. A subtle vein of humour also permeates, especially when the jealous Dino gets constantly sucked into ridiculous interrogations of his lover’s activities and associations, and when he futilely spies on her movements. And the class distinctions between the working class and the aristocracy are well drawn.I wasn’t bored with this book, despite its overbearing style. The character studies presented were intriguing and realistic, and mildly scary.
—Shane

Yet another "existential" novel about a disaffected rich prick going through an existential crisis. Like Sartre's protagonist in Nausea or Huysmans' Against Nature, the protagonist here is a spoiled twit who feels disconnected with the world, but he calls it "boredom." Fair enough. Our poor little rich boy has stopped painting (it's boring) and really isn't doing much other than spying on his neighbors (but only half-heartedly since that's also boring). Enter one 17 year old vamp who, except for sex, is even more disconnected than he is, but has none of his intellectual curiosity (but even then, he's only interested in himself and his boredom, not in the rest of the world). He decides to dump her (she's boring) but she starts acting weird which annoys the shit out of our protagonist because he thought he, like, totally possessed her, but now she's acting on her own. So he becomes obsessed and no longer bored and realizes that she is a stand in for the mystery and abject otherness of the world. He decides he must possess her and then, and only then, can he dump her (because she's boring). But until he possesses her, she's not boring.Like any good existential novel, there is no real ending. I mean, he does half-heartedly try to kill himself, and very briefly attempts to kill her, but only barely. And he's still bored at the end, but not as much. Oh yeah, I forgot: he hates his mother because she's rich and is obsessed with money. It is well written and it is compelling, but it drove me insane - which is what it wanted to do.
—Troy

Write Review

(Review will shown on site after approval)

Read books by author William Weaver

Read books in category Food & Cookbooks