Share for friends:

Read Hannibal Rising (2006)

Hannibal Rising (2006)

Online Book

Author
Rating
3.41 of 5 Votes: 2
Your rating
ISBN
0385339410 (ISBN13: 9780385339414)
Language
English
Publisher
delacorte press

Hannibal Rising (2006) - Plot & Excerpts

A huge disappointment. I had my hopes way up. Who can blame me? Red Dragon and The Silence of the Lambs were freaking masterpieces. There were things I liked and things I hated. Probably, had I read it before knowing who Hannibal Lecter was, I would've enjoyed it more, but his personality (unexpected, mysterious, but we did know a few traits of his) was established, only for this sorry excuse for a prequel to destroy all we knew about him, mess him up and offer no plausible explanation to why he turned out like this. To me, had this really been Lecter's past, he would have been a 100% different person.I actually bought his early childhood and the Mischa subplot. I liked it up to when he leaves the orphanage. What happened to his sister, to me, was a (half) belivable explanation to why he became a cannibal, but this is where the things I liked stop.Madame Murasaki was interesting at first, when she seemed to have a pretty distorted vision on honor and morality. She first seemed not to mind his killing spree, but then, all of a sudden, it turns into a no-no. She was a very back-and-forth character, and not in the good, unpredictable way, but in the badly written way.For a person who is fascinated with serial killers and their backgrounds, why they turned like this, I can tell you that definitely, without the slightest hint of doubt, revenge is NOT what drives a serial killer, IN NO WAY ON THIS PLANET. Harris tried to make him this vengeful hero, which makes no sense. Psychopaths kill in order to fulfill their fantasies, for the pleasure of it, and they objectify their victims. In no way it is for any other purpose than pure psychotic pleasure. NOT VENGEANCE! This psychological inaccuracy drove me mad throughout the entire book. Some people said it was lame, but it wasn't JUST lame. It had no basis. Even in his first kill, what drove him was saving the honor of lady Murasaki, which made him this twisted hero. Man, don't make serial killers what they're not. Ted Bundy, Ed Gein, Charles Manson, not a single serial killer had this concept of morality that we were supposed to believe Lecter had. It contradicts the very definition of the serial killer.I cannot speak about any other characters since they were all plain. Popil, for example, was simply an incompetent investigator with no apparent personality, and the band of merry war criminals was laughable at times.What a parody of what used to be Thomas Harris's genius...

Ok, this is another book I had to read before I saw the movie. I cannot believe I wasted money on it. I even bought it in hardcover! Sometimes I can be such a dunce.This has to be the worst pre-quel-sequel ever! There is no reason to read this book, or see the movie! But if you are a fan, like I am, don't feel guilty, do what you want.This is my least favorite of Harris's "Hannibal Saga." His reasoning for Lecter's particular "taste" is, get this, REVENGE. How lame! It doesn't seem like any real serial killer would start their rampage to seek revenge, although in his case, his childhood was emotionally disturbing. As of still, I was not impressed, not to mention, a subplot involving an underground network of profiteering World War II criminals (Lecter's enemies), specializing in stolen artwork...come on! Oh, by the way, they didn't include this in the film. Everything about Harris's "young" Lecter seemed too far fetched, from his "medical studies" and re-illustrations for anatomy texts, to his Japanese geisha-like aunt/love-interest who lives in Paris. Even the concept that the-then-child Hannibal had to run and hide from the Nazis did not seem fathomable. I read somewhere that Harris had "gone gay" for Lecter after turning out the "disappointing" last installment called merely, Hannibal. Which kind of offends me, but not for their use of illustrating an author's relationship with their character as homosexual, but that that novel was not disappointing. [Juilanne Moore as Clarice is another story.] Hannibal, if I must say, is a truly better piece of fiction and more true to the Lecter that we all learned to love in The Silence of the Lambs and Red Dragon. Why can't Dr. Lecter be the cannibalizing psychiatrist who helps out the FBI every once in a while? This book has forever ruined that image for me.

What do You think about Hannibal Rising (2006)?

You know that Simpsons scene where Mr. Burns has the monkeys typing in a room, playing the odds that one must eventually write the next Great American Novel? This is not it. This is the leftovers Mojo the monkey left. Hannibal Lecter is the ultimate Mary Sue, behind Wesley Crusher. This book reads like screenplay rather than a novel. I hope Thomas Harris took a glee from being forced to write his most beloved character into the ground. More than likely, he sobbed all the way to the bank. Good for you! I'm never going to get those 335 pages back.
—Heather

After finishing this final installment to the Lecter series I discovered that I did not enjoy this book as much as the first three. But it was definitely still worth the read. The first few chapters were a bit confusing with so many characters coming into play. I had to make sure that I stayed focused. Also I feel it lacked some of the mystery and intensity that the first three had. I found myself having to go back over a few pages so I could grasp the story better from the start. There were also some parts to the book that I did not think really needed to be included, it made the story feel a little draggy. I did however still love the poetic style of Thomas Harris as he is able to carry it over to this book. The characters were fabulous as they were in the first three. I just feel some areas could have been cleaned up a bit.This book really allows you to discover Lecter's very tragic life. Harris really lets the readers crawl inside Lecter's mind and experience his life as a child and what he witnessed and went through as well. We are allowed to watch him grow into adulthood and how he handles situations. You also get to see exactly how smart Lecter is even at a young age.He had to face many many trials in his life such as the loss of his family and friends. I suppose I can understand why he was the way he was after reading this. As Popil said, Lecter, the child, died in 1945. And we all learn who this 'new' Lecter is. I have come to discover that Lecter really just wanted some justice, and he was the only one to see to it.
—Janie Johnson

This book is so fucking abysmal that I can’t finish it. It’s a very rare thing for me not to get through a book even if it’s a struggle. I’ll torture myself to get to the end because I get this feeling like I’m cheating myself and the author if I don’t. If someone else gets through the 323 pages of wasted paper god bless you. Every word reads like an exercise in how to bilk the public out of a couple of more dollars with a character that accidentally became famous. Hannibal Lechter is one of the great evil characters of modern American writing and cinema and the book “Hannibal Rising” does it’s very best to destroy all of his appeal. The whole draw of Hannibal Lechter is that he exudes menace and villainy while still showing a wholly respectable exterior. The vile behavior bubbling underneath only peeks out and seemingly has no basis for its existence. Lechter seems to be evil for no other reason then that he is. In “Hannibal Rising”, Thomas Harris gives us some reasoning for his malevolence. Hannibal goes mad because he is forced to watch some bad guys eat his little sister while trapped and starving in a cabin during the winter after the Nazis slaughter the rest of his family. So instead of being the ultimate bad guy himself, Harris makes Lechter someone to sort of sympathize with. Thus ruining one of the great evils of the last 20 years or so.Despite the total absurdity of the story itself you would be able to forgive Harris the mistake of writing this book. After all, it is a character he created and perhaps he felt like there was more to the story that he needed to tell. Unfortunately it doesn’t read that way at all. It reads like the novel was written to be a screenplay from the minute he put pen to page (or finger to keyboard as it more likely was). The dialogue is brittle and unimpressive and the description and narrative are sorely lacking. It’s all like it was written with the intention to touch it up later. Every word that passed by my eyes made it seem more and more like there’s no other interest here then in stealing my money. I’m going to do my best to forget that both the book and the movie “Hannibal Rising” ever existed so I can go back to loving Hannibal Lechter.
—Mike

Write Review

(Review will shown on site after approval)

Read books by author Thomas Harris

Read books in series hannibal lecter

Read books in category History & Biography