It was sweet with a handful of sexy. It's not a long book so while the characters weren't well developed, they were good enough for the length. It would have been nice to get to know them a little better though. The end was weirdly wordy about a few things that didn't really help the story but mostly satisfying so the extra words were forgivable. I had mixed feeling about the signatures on the text messages though. They were sweet and playful but I just kept thinking "who has a signature for their text messages? Emails, sure. Text messages, no." Okay story line, but poorly written. Too little emotions and waaay to many cliches (and I usually don't mind cliches).Favorite quote: "That's good- a couple with the obvious attraction and mutual care I see - according to my culture's folklore it means your love can stand the test of time." I mean seriously. That has got to be the vaguest folklore ever. And I wanted more EMOTION. There was little except "let's fuck" and "now I'm angry" and a lot of I love you's that we didn't really get an explanation for and just felt empty. It had some promise but no. This book made time pass and I didn't cry from the badness, but it wasn't exactly good either.
What do You think about My Brother's Best Friend (2000)?
It was free and I needed something quick and easy to read. That is exactly what this was.
—andrew12345
Sweet and beautiful so any romance should be even with life's difficulties.
—mrgrace
I enjoyed this book very mush and really liked Devin and CJ.
—ntombimogale
