Share for friends:

Read Primary Inversion (1996)

Primary Inversion (1996)

Online Book

Genre
Rating
3.75 of 5 Votes: 2
Your rating
ISBN
0812550234 (ISBN13: 9780812550238)
Language
English
Publisher
tor books

Primary Inversion (1996) - Plot & Excerpts

At the beginning of the year I decided to actively seek out and read SF&F written by women or with women occupying the titular roles. As you may imagine, when I first learned about Catherine Asaro , a female author who writes hard SF while reading the Complete Guide to Writing Science Fiction, I was excited and impressed and went in immediate search of books written by her. Aside from being an author and dancer, Asaro has degrees in chemistry and physics from Harvard. I felt immediately assured that her books would give me that blend of believable SF and intriguing narrative I love. However, not until I started to read Primary Inversion did I realize that she can also be billed as a romance author. This is where things sort of went bad for me.I’m not sure if this is the point at which I am supposed to hand over my honorary girl’s club membership card, but I have a difficult time with strong elements of romance in my books. This is a personal preference. More accurately, I can tolerate romance if it is tasteful, subtle, and does not make up the bulk of the story. Not quite so with PI, but this is not my only issue with this book.It’s not that I hate romance… it’s just that I do. Ha. Specifically, I don’t appreciate the over sentimentalized, sappy, UNREALISTIC, heart-rung quality romance novels frequently present us with. Even more specifically, I prefer stories wherein the romance is a happenstance occurrence and not the crux of the tale.Primary Inversion (PI) is the first novel in the Saga of the Skolian Empire series. PI is a hard SF, space opera, political intrigue and, yes, romance novel. As I typically do with my reviews, I will try to discuss the merits of the book as I see and understand them without spoiling it for those who eventually chose to go on and read it.PI is written in first person POV in the voice of the main character, Sauscony Valdoria (Soz). Soz is an intelligent, powerful super soldier-type who leads her own fighter squadron. She is attractive and at forty-eight years old looks about half that. Part of her super soldier prowess is due to her many cybernetic implants, but also in part to her genetic make-up. She is Rhon (I still honestly don’t get it) and this makes her, in addition to everything else, a powerful empath. She is funny and spunky, bright and quick witted. Soz is also the sister of Kurj, Imperator of the Skolian Imperialate, and she is next in line to take his place. What this means is that she is old money wealthy and practically royalty. Her biggest internal conflict is a ten year old psychological wound she carries after having been once kidnapped and raped by an Aristo, a race that derives pleasure from the pain of empaths.At first I thought it was the first person POV that I didn’t like, but then I realized that in this case, first person wasn’t the issue so much as the character of Soz herself. She is quite the Mary Sue:•tVery Beautiful•tStrangely colored hair•tAll men want her•tEven men who don’t like her want her•tAn especially skilled pilot/leader/soldier•tHeiress apparent to the Skolian Imperialate •tPractically royalty•tWealthy•tTragic past (rape) she is still traumatized by making her vulnerable at just the right situations•tHighly potent empath (Empathy is her supernatural power further strengthen by cybernetic implants? Although there are others with this power, hers is particularly strong and well-honed.)•tPretentious name - Sauscony Valdoria? Really?•tIncorruptible•tNearly fifty but looks twenty-something•tRecognized her true love via ecstasy inducing mind meldDuring the course of this book, which spans over a few months, Soz enters into three relationships. The first and most appropriate is with a man who eventually becomes a paraplegic. He breaks up with her so as not to destroy her life and prospects. Of course she was prepared to forego her comfort and her position for him, but... Her second relationship is with a twenty something year old who seems terribly naïve. Their relationship was hardly explored outside of their cuddling and romps. He was her golden haired boytoy. The last relationship was with a twenty year old named Jaibriol Qox, who she met in the beginning of the book. JQ wasn’t just naïve but he was wholly inexperienced and also, being Rhon, had this immediate mental connection with her that meant that they were soul mates. The problem with this was that JQ is the heir apparent of the opposing side a galactic war.Yes, what we have here is a Romeo and Juliet-ish tale.I don’t like Romeo and Juliet.I don’t like my characters perfect and awesome and unflawed.I don’t like spending an entire book stuck in the head of a character whose stuck on themselves. She spends a lot of time stuck in Woe-is-me-land and I can’t stand that place. Not only that, rape or not, I have a difficult time feeling as sorry for her as she does for herself. As a matter of fact, there was a scene in which, while drunk, she “mistakenly” held a loaded weapon to her head. I kinda wished she would have pulled the trigger. Oh, the misery.I’d also like to note here that JQ is the much younger male mirror image of Soz. In other words, Gary Stu. See all those Mary Sue traits listed above? Yep. That’s him with the odd adjustment here and there.So, you’re likely wondering why I finished this book. Well, in Asaro’s defense, and mine, PI presents so many interesting and fresh concepts and ideas that I can’t declare it a complete loss. The problem is that the ideas that I personally found interesting, were either not well developed of weighted in simple yet excessive narrative. Again, first person brought me too close to this character who I did not care for. I believe that had this been written in third person, despite my dislike for Soz, I could have stomached her.As far as the SF elements go, there are a ton of detailed technical descriptions that instead of adding to the overall depth of the story actually slowed the pacing. I skipped huge chunks to get back into the fray because at some point I’d just glaze over. Part of the issue, I believe, is the fact that PI has too many things going on. You know, less is more, and all that jazz. We have empathic beings, racial issues (although everyone in this book seemed human and white… don’t even get me started on that), cultural issues, strong military elements, space travel, political intrigue, cybernetic implantation, AI…About halfway in, I started thinking about McMasters-Bujold with her subtle use of technical verbiage and easy believable romantic elements. I missed that while reading PI. I know it isn’t entirely fair to compare the two authors, but the similarities and the differences are striking, I think, and Asaro could learn something from McMasters-Bujold about subtlety and believable relationship progression.For me, the crux of the issue is that this story with all of its political intrigue and SF elements, which I’d normally enjoy, appears to have been woven to support these unlikely romances as opposed to the romances occurring as the natural result of what happens when two attractive unattached and compatible people are thrown together. Deus Ex Machina is shamelessly and ruthlessly employed here and in the course of one tale is so over used as to become absolutely unacceptable.The unfortunate past rape of Soz is a looming element in this tale, as it colors Soz’s future experiences. I know that rape happens in real life, that it can alter how a woman sees herself, how she feels about the world around her and that it colors future relationships. Rape is tragic and horrific and unacceptable no matter what. That said, I don’t object to the inclusion of such a tragic element in a story if employed with the sensitivity it deserves. However, in this case I do resent its use as it feels like a pillar upon which to prop the protagonist whose character is annoying, weakly constructed, and paper thin.

It can be difficult finding good science fiction with actual science written by women. I heard about Catherine Asaro way back when I attended a writers’ convention over ten years ago. (The name might have been dropped by Connie Willis, who I was hanging out with–funny woman.) I purchased this book along with her second book, but then life kind of went haywire (I got a divorce and became a single mother). The books sat on my shelf, were boxed up, and then sat on my new shelf in my new house, for years.Funny how the invention of the eReader has caused me to go back and start moving through my pile of books I always meant to read but never had the time. Since I can carry the Kindle in my purse, anywhere is a good place to read, and I can read multiple books at a time.So I finally got to read this. And I really enjoyed it.The book has a good mixture of space opera, science of bioengineering and space/time, and then also character development and romance. The opening scene was great with the image of these burly, over-muscled, armored and armed Jagernauts (and I’m sorry, but in my head I hear the German–”Yaegernawt”–because in German “Jager” means “hunter.” Otherwise it sounds too much like “Juggernaut” and I just didn’t like that). It looked like a scene out of Halo to me. I really liked the juxtaposition of outward strength and fighting ability in the main character combined with her inner vulnerability and damage as a rape victim. The book had several of these contrasting themes, which I think enriched it.I also really liked the whole scenario of two warring cultures and a classic Romeo and Juliet setup. The book lost me in a few technical details during the starfight but picked me back up again when it dealt with the psychological aftermath of war. (It gets very techy, which even though I’ve read up on string theory and relativity and particle science was still a bit beyond me. So someone else will have to discuss the merits of the science. It looked good to me.) There are moments of humor as well as painful moments of human weakness and family dysfunction (in some cases REALLY dysfunctional).I’ve already picked up the sample for Book 4–it seems that Books 2 and 3 are out of print and not yet in eBook form, so I’m hoping Asaro is working on getting the rights back on those to do it herself. I actually own Book 2 so I may be forced to actually read a physical book again for that.I think my only complaint is that I wanted more by the end. This isn’t a comment on the plot–I think Asaro ended the book precisely where it needed to end. This is just the sign that she hooked me as a reader.So for those who like a mixture of hard science together with a space opera feel as well as romance and “softer” psychology, I definitely recommend this book.

What do You think about Primary Inversion (1996)?

Glorioskies was this a bad book, I'd read it before and didn't like it but needed an audiobook and this was available and I wasn't sure I'd read it so I gave it a chance. It was worse than I remembered. You've got these space going emotional vampires that feed on a race of empaths, and assuming you can make it past that the princess of empaths meets the prince of vampires and they fall in love but discover he's not a real vampire inside and just needs the love of an empath princess and have to fight against the cruel universe to live their love.The love story was horrible, the combat scenes boring, the politics inane, the economics non existent, the sex pathetic, this was almost total crap from beginning to end. The only good part in the entire book was the PTSD bit, that actually didn't suck much, but even it was a little too therapy montage than real exploration of the issue.Really this was a horrible book.
—R. Michael Litchfield

Primary Inversion is a quick, fun read. Nothing profound.There's quite a bit too much world-building in the first pages, and the amount of pseudo-science babble is pretty extreme. A few of the characters are well conceived, but the villains are stick figures.The best part, I think, is the portrayal of the psychiatric profession, astonishingly enough. If the next books in the series were available at my local library, I might read more. But they aren't, and there are too many other books awaiting for me to put much effort into this. Although the blurb of the third book did seem somewhat intriguing...
—Richard

Asaro has real science training; Heinlein had real science training. When Heinlein wrote stories with men bedding women half their age, he was called a master of hard sci-fi. When Asaro writes stories with women bedding men half their age, she gets called a romance writer. What is the difference between these two writers? Their sex!When men write romance into their sci-fi, it's still usually considered sci-fi. When women write romance into their sci-fi, no matter if there's technical content all over--it's still usually considered a romance. Even when women have real science experience, they're still diminished in sci-fi in some fashion, they're still almost never as successful as many males who have no real science experience, they're still pigeonholed as being emotional rather than logical.Most of the sci-fi written by men that I've read is loaded with just as much romance as most of the sci-fi written by women. Do those men and their writing get diminished and pigeonholed all over? Of course not! If Asaro writes romance, then so did Heinlein, but that term is almost never applied to the works of male sci-fi writers. Funny that.Primary Inversion is what's commonly called hard sci-fi. But the gender roles of the characters are often flipped, so it's anti-patriarchal, which is a sin in a largely patriarchal society. Therefore, it's barely been read compared to the sci-fi written by many males, including those with no science experience and who don't know even basic science.When a bit more women began getting attention in sci-fi, especially women with real-science experience, people had to find a way to gender-role them and make them seem lesser at sci-fi, so the term science-fiction romance was popularized. But, the truth IMO is: most of the sci-fi written by men is also science-fiction romance. Funny that the term hadn't been popularized toward THEIR fiction.(I think that because many people tend to be focused on love and sex, most fiction contains at least a little romance, but only women are expected to list their fiction in that category. I'd love to see men being expected to do the same.)
—F.P.

Write Review

(Review will shown on site after approval)

Read books by author Catherine Asaro

Read books in series saga of the skolian empire

Read books in category Fiction