Got halfway through it and then stopped several days ago. I'm not a frequent reader of smut, so maybe this isn't an accurate review, but I found myself struggling to stay interested in this. Despite my love for poor Teela, I thought the other characters weren't very interesting and the sex scenes started to lose their heat and intensity to me after Act 1. This book has a lot of the hallmarks of typical urban (READ: BLACK PEOPLE) books -- both erotic and non-erotic. Lots of arguing with lovers, moral dilemmas and graphic sex. But Miki and Valencia sounded unrealistic, Brandi was just depressing and like I said before, I had sympathy for Teela... sympathy only gets you so far though in a book like this. I won this book off goodreads.com first read giveaway. At first I didn't realize it was considered "erotica". I'm not a prude and I really don't have a problem with erotica but this book was very graphic and very repetitive. The story follows four sexaholics as they try to become 'sober'. I disliked the transitions or lack thereof between the characters. I had to constantly turn back a page or two in order to remember who's story I was reading about. I thought the author brought in too many characters that made things even more confusing. I gave the book two stars because it wasn't a horrible book but it wasn't a good book either. But then again, My normal genre isn't erotica.
What do You think about Sexaholics (2010)?
This book was crazy. It is true that people are addicted to sex and these stories prove it.
—zaza1239
