شيرلوك مات أو ماماتش. ليه ده حصل؟ بسبب جايمس موريارتي؟ طيب ما شيرلوك هزمه خلاص! الواقع إن سير آرثر كونان دويل غيرته من شيرلوك هولمز زادت جدا لدرجة إنه سعي لتدميره علشان يخلص من شهرته دي. الناس عارفة الشخصية وبتنسي الكاتب.طبعا مشم حتاج أقول إن الناس فضلت تترجي فيه لحد ما نزل تاني بقصص بعدها وخلاه "بطريقة ما" يرجع للحياة. أو بمعني آخر، ماماتش في شلالات رايخنباخ. I thought I knew the basic premise of this story when I started it, but it turns out I knew the whole thing. This incredibly slim volume is considered the final of only four novels in the Sherlock Holmes series. There are many additional short stories. Written from Watson’s point-of-view we see an increasingly paranoid Sherlock taking extreme measures to escape his arch-nemesis Dr. Moriarty. The pair, one an unconventional, brilliant detective, the other a criminal mastermind are perfectly matched. Sherlock has finally found his intellectual equal; unfortunately they are pitted against one another. You can’t help but hear the admiration in Sherlock’s voice as he describes the villains’ evil empire. Here’s a bit about Moriarty in Sherlock’s own words…“He is the Napoleon of crime, Watson. He is the organizer of half that is evil and of nearly all that is undetected in this great city. He is a genius, a philosopher, an abstract thinker. He has a brain of the first order. He sits motionless, like a spider in the center of its web, but that web has a thousand radiations, and he knows well every quiver of each of them. He does little himself. He only plans.”BOTTOM LINE: A worthy conclusion to Sherlock’s story, I only wish it had been longer! I would still recommend The Sign of Four as the best place to start if you’re new to Sherlock.
What do You think about The Final Problem (2000)?
Might be that Im infulsenced a bit to much by the movies, so I forgot how he really died
—ebookman
'Bout the only adventure here is that Sherlock is killed...or is he?
—ruchi
