Share for friends:

Read The Ravens: The Men Who Flew In America's Secret War In Laos (1987)

The Ravens: The Men Who Flew In America's Secret War In Laos (1987)

Online Book

Genre
Rating
4.2 of 5 Votes: 5
Your rating
ISBN
0517566125 (ISBN13: 9780517566121)
Language
English
Publisher
crown publishers, inc.

The Ravens: The Men Who Flew In America's Secret War In Laos (1987) - Plot & Excerpts

By now you have probably heard that Laos is the most bombed country on the planet thanks to the spectacular deployment of American air power during the Vietnam War, most notably an onslaught of B-52s (aka, Big Ugly Fat Fuckers) that on Henry Kissenger’s orders commenced bombing the jungles of Northern Laos in 1970 AGAINST THE ADVICE OF EVERY AMERICAN MILITARY PILOT STATIONED IN LAOS AT THAT TIME. Those pilots were called Ravens.This is one of the most important and overlooked bits of information about what is possibly the most catastrophically fucked-up air war to date, and that is not the only such obscure bit, and those bits are what make this account so important. An alternate book title might be The Bird Dog and The B-52. Bird Dog B-52To my knowledge, this is the most thorough account of the mostly American pilots who served as forward-air-controllers (FACs) in Northern Laos during the Vietnam War. They, the Ravens, flew small spotter craft called Bird Dogs directing air strikes in support of Hmong and Lao troops defending their villages and territories against legions of North Vietnamese infantry, and this was hardly the first time the Hmong and Lao had fought the Vietnamese, the antagonisms go way back. Which is not to say that America’s intent was altruistic. We wouldn’t have bothered had the North Vietnamese not been attempting to advance their front against our ally, South Vietnam. Trouble is, American air intervention in Laos amounted to overkill that proved about as deadly to our friends.For example, and to get back to the aforementioned and ill-advised B-52s:B-52s had never been used in northern Laos before (1970), although they had bombed the Ho Chi Minh Trail in the southern panhandle since 1965 . . . The B-52 was the backbone of the Strategic Air Command, the bomber built to deliver nuclear weapons. The Air Force had hurriedly trained crews in the delivery of conventional weapons, and since June 1965 it had been used in Indochina on a daily basis. "The Ravens were asked their opinion regarding the potential use of the bomber in the air war in Laos . . . Their answer was surprising: unanimous condemnation of such a move . . . ‘We said forget it, it won’t work,’ (Craig) Morrison said. ‘. . . even if you kill the enemy, without troops to hold the territory you’re just spinning your wheels. You’ll be playing your last trump card and the enemy will find out it’s no good.’ Both the military advice of the Ravens and the political advice of the (American) ambassador, who actually ran the war, were studiously ignored.” (p. 215-216)WHY, you may ask. Part of the problem was the U.S. Air Force, not just in Laos but in general. What you need in a jungle air war like the Vietnam War, assuming you ought to be fighting the war in the first place, is:. . . something slow-moving that could see a target and could zero in on it and stay with it until it had destroyed it with Gatling guns or canon. This flew in the face of current Air Force doctrine and the view of General Momyer, who wanted an all-jet Air Force and was committed to employing state-of-the-art aircraft in Vietnam. There had been an acrimonious interagency debate over whether propeller or jet planes should be used in Vietnam, with the Air Force arguing that jets were better for close air support than slower, prop-driven aircraft. This was nonsense, and the Air Force knew it was nonsense, but did not want to end up after what was expected to be a short, guerrilla war with an inventory of prop planes.” (p. 115)That’s the air force's excuse, but what the hell was Kissenger’s problem, the same Henry Kissenger who had flat-out said: “No American administration could possibly desire a war in a country like Laos. It would not make sense to expand the conflict into Laos, except for the minimum required for our own protection.” (p. 226)Kissenger’s problem was Nixon’s Vietnamization policy, by which Nixon claimed to be successfully handing the war over to South Vietnam while America exited with honor.The White House felt that Vietnamization was proceeding too slowly and that the South Vietnamese Army would not be able to bridge the gap left by the continual U.S. troop withdrawals. Air power was to bridge that gap, adding yet another political dimension to a bomber that was already employed for organizational (air force) purposes and interagency rivalry. The B-52 was to become one of the cornerstones of U.S. policy in Indochina (more specifically, in Laos) . . . and Air Force histories for this period are entitled ‘The Administration Emphasizes Air Power’ and ‘The Role of Air Power Grows.’ (p. 219) Given the political imperative, Kissenger advised the Secretary of Defense that all of the B-52 sorties that he, Kissenger, ordered for the coming year (1970) would be flown “regardless of the military situation.” And so it came to pass that Big Ugly Fat Fuckers commenced bombing Laos such that it became the most bombed country on the planet, against the advice of every American military pilot stationed in Laos at that time, and those pilots were called Ravens.To this day, cluster and fragmentation bombs are in Laos still, waiting to be accidentally stepped upon and set off by unfortunate passersby. The clean-up of residual fallout and collateral damage may never end, and several Ravens have been involved in that and other attempts at restoration and restitution.There’s more, much more, to the Raven story, and I recommend that anyone interested in understanding American military policy and practice in the 20th century read it with a highlighter in hand.

What do You think about The Ravens: The Men Who Flew In America's Secret War In Laos (1987)?

This book is a fairly gritty account of the fighting in Laos alongside the war across the border in Vietnam. I had no idea of the true scale of this conflict until I opened this book. I had previously thought it to be merely a fight against relatively small communist insurgent groups who were aiding the North Vietnamese. And, yes whilst this was happening, there was SO much more to the story and this book is one of the places where you'll find some of the facts.The Ravens were a group of forward air control pilots drawn from the regular forces in Vietnam who signed up for a secret 'not really happening' operation staging out of the top secret Long Tieng base in the Laotian mountains. These guys flew missions to guide air strikes and rescues among other things in their small single-engined Cessna aircraft.The story is very interesting and full of facts and figures about the war along with some great accounts of the action and the horrors of war. I found it a little fragmented in some places and found that I would occasionally lose my way and had to retrace my steps to get back on track again. That is my only niggle with what is essentially an excellent factual war history story.A good read and essential if you're into war and military history.
—Les

Fascinating perspective into The Secret War in Laos and a very skillful portrayal of individual pilots who were involved, but the history it contains seems limited, selective and in some cases very suspect. The narrative ignores internal Laos politics to portray the issue as "tribes vs Vietnamese aggression", whilst simultaneously idealising and patronising the H'mong minorities who fought with the US (and who are in many ways Robbins' heroes of the book). Although critical of US policy that is in many ways indefensible with historical hindsight, it is in a very blinkered and stereotypical manner: Robbins dislikes "the suits" of hierarchy and loves to show that "the mavericks" know better. He also glosses over issues like H'mong child soldiers and other huge moral issues that don't fit with his reductive "good vs bad" narrative. In this way, the book provides an interesting, if flawed, alternative conception of the conflict.
—Ben

This book is every bit as good as Robbins' other work, Air America. Just as with the latter, The Ravens reads almost as an adventure story. But it's history. And Robbins enjoyed unparalleled access to many of the men who were Ravens, forward air controllers in Laos during the "Secret War." Today, this group of veterans is quickly disappearing from the scene. Most are in the late 70s and early 80s. Fortunately, Robbins was there to cover the story of Air America and The Ravens from the 70s to the 2000s. Alas, Robbins himself passed away almost two years ago. An invaluable resource for the history of the neglected part of the war in Southeast Asia is no longer with us.
—Paul Cornelius

Write Review

(Review will shown on site after approval)

Read books by author Christopher Robbins

Read books in category Fiction