Having read a couple of Pearl S. Buck’s Chinese novels; I was drawn to “Death in the Castle” due to the novel taking place in England versus China. The question is: can Buck maintain a story in a setting outside of the “norm”?“Death in the Castle” stands true to Buck style by jumping directly into the plot versus introducing characters. This ‘works’ because Sir Richard, Lady Mary, Kate, Wells, etc; are familiar and relatable without necessarily needing an introduction. At the same time, the characters don’t particularly evolve and fit too cleanly into a box while also causing some confusion (for example: Kate doesn’t speak or act like a maid at all).Immediately, the pace is swift and easy flowing, resulting in a fast read. The issue lays with inconsistency as some events are “cheesy” and best described as a “Downtown Abbey for teens”; while other sections are deeper and provide more ample thinking in regards to philosophical theories (versus simple dramatic novel events). This inconsistency also bleeds though to the images and settings which aren’t explored or expressed enough (especially historically – it is difficult to figure out the time frame of the novel) and yet are easily imagined. “Death in the Castle” feels somewhat like a screenplay and summary which one could see portrayed on the silver screen.“Death in the Castle” lacks the peaceful Zen experienced in Buck’s Chinese novels which may disappoint some readers but will please those who seek a more upbeat vibe. However, it often feels too modern, making “Death in the Castle” choppy, at times. Also odd is Buck’s choice to not include any chapter breaks which makes the text one long string. This makes the book difficult to put down (in a good encouraging page turning) but is a negative when needing a bathroom break.Buck’s simplistic style and ability to conceal the underlying premise of the novel (and of the meaning of the novel title), while still maintaining a steady pace; is well-conceived and promising. Part Two of “Death in the Castle” is a complete 180-degree turn of events with much more drama and suspense. Although some of these are clichés, while the others are compelling; they are enjoyable and creative (albeit, even if a little silly at times). This action becomes quite exciting with multiple events occurring on each page and will remind the reader of a murder mystery dinner or ‘Clue’ game. History fans will also revel with the mention of or connection with well-know English historical events.The conclusion of “Death in the Castle” is weak as Buck plays on anticipation and builds suspense but closes the novel not answering all questions, and/or answering them in an unbelievable or odd way. Other storylines (such as Kate’s) are too easily solved and perfectly happily-ever-after. Buck is too abrupt and lacking creativity and spunk with this ending.“Death in the Castle” is spirited, fun, and enjoyable; and a great novel for mystery/HF readers whom seek a one-day, quick read. Although, one shouldn’t expect Buck’s usual depth or appeal; “Death in the Castle” isn’t bad and is written decently well.
Book club choice. Slow moving so far, but I am hoping for the best. Well, I never actually got to the Death that occurs in the castle. I had about 60 pages to go once I got to book club last night. An overall idea of "meh" was heard by most of the people in the group. I have heard compared to her other books, Death in the Castle, just doesn't suit up to Buck's potential. I give this a sad 1 star rating. I really liked the discription of the castle, the characters were somewhat interesting in their behaviors and strangeness, but the piece just didnt move fast enough for me or hold my attention for more that a few pages at a time.
What do You think about Death In The Castle (1988)?
I was a bit skeptical at first concerning this book. I love Pearl S Buck as an author – her book “The Good Earth” is one of my favorites. And this book is nothing like any of Buck’s other works. This one is set in England, not China. It’s somewhat suspensful, not an epic life story or a story of hardship. I love the characters. And Lady Mary is one of the most wonderful characters I’ve come across in a long time, although she isn’t really a primary person. After reading it, I feel like I could travel to Starbourough and meet them and feel perfectly at home.
—Sarah
Struggled to get through this book, started off pretty decent but then the writing style changed and became more confusing and really kind of idiotic. Read it just to get to the end to see if I was right on one of the "mysteries" involved but even that was still only alluded too. Readers never really get all the answers, was an unsatisfying answer...and a main character I liked ended up being crazy, which was not alluded to at all until just all of a sudden, and I did not care for that at all. Getting rid of this books for sure.
—Deanna Anderson
so wish I could give this a minus something but goodreads only goes down to one star. so far every book I have read of hers which was published by her second husband, john day, has been terrible. This was an all time loser, so much so I tore it up when I finished it. I think she forgot how to write or lost interest in it when she moved back to the states. I still have five more of her books written in that time period to read and dread them. She still remains one of my all time favorite authors from her earlier books.
—John
