And all this hysteria because he is "female" again. The series needs a character that speaks turkey with these guys and at least states that this is not more freaky than the rest. However I doubt that since none of the supernatural characters actually act like being so old as stated in the books.And I don't like it that Mrs. Hagen lumps the more mature humans in the same pot as those immature dwarves (mainly Cecil, Johnny, the two Japanese guys and Nero), she makes overgrown kids out of them, and then again she does the same with the warriors.Despite how nice Law in general is, I can't help but think that at least a part of him sees Josh as his property. But it was good to finally see a warrior that likes to catch and Laws situation shows that these chimp-wolves actually think less of their mates, respectively regard them a lower status because they bottom. For them being big means you are a top and being small a bottom. Some strong female should come along and beat the shit out of 90 percent of the Bracs. This one showed a lot of stereotyping. It is implied that Law isn't manly for "playing" the bottom. It means that all the mates are unmanly in their eyes. In that case, go and find yourselves women! They make fun of him for being versatile (which isn't unusual), so what do they think of their mates? I'd kick all their asses :DThis books makes us believe that a big, manly guy being the bottom is extremely unusual, strange, out of the ordinary etc. Like your preferences are decided by your looks. Big men only top, small men only bottom. Since Josh is so feminine he would never want to top. It is actually bigoted and discriminating. Other than that I enjoyed reading it. Could have been a 3-4 star for an easy read.
What do You think about Joshua's Law (2011)?
2.5 starsmust be sunday, another Brac Pack book!
—freedom
Loved Joshua! Wish there had been more of him.
—propersearch
