Started off with potential, but it didn't really go anywhere despite the three year fast forward. There wasn't a lot of details, there wasn't any character development, there wasn't any conflict and I'm not really even sure there was really even a climax. There was a magical wand that was supposed to convince us that they were in instalove when nothing really happened. On the upside, the writing wasn't bad and it doesn't take a whole lot of thinking to get through the book. This book kept popping up in my recommendations on Amazon so much that I finally decided to try it. I wish I hadn't. The first part of the book was great. I loved the story at Disneyland. I even liked the first part three years later before they meet again. I even believe they could be that attracted to each other at the party when they finally meet again. I do not believe that any sane person would get married the day they see someone for the first time after three years. Also, they only knew each other for a day three years before. A day!!! I do believe they could have started dating and developed a natural paced relationship but not marriage immediately. Especially marriage without conflict. There wasn't any conflict from anyone about this wedding. Their friends are terrible to let them do this. They are terrible for wanting to get married. End of story.
What do You think about Three Years Later (2013)?
Kept waiting for some sort of plot twist, that never came. A sweet light romance. Good summer read.
—Kathy
The book is very unrealistic for me. Haha. 3 stars is me being generous.
—ringmybel